ワンダーカジノスロット

This page uses Javascript. Please enable Javascript in your browser. Skip to Content Japanese English Chinese About RIETI Site Map Help Contact Discussion Papers Search Site Search Menu Research Areas Research Programs (FY2024-2028) Research Programs (FY2020-2023) Research Programs (FY2016-2019) Research Programs (FY2011-2015) Policy Research Domains (FY2006-2010) Projects Survey Fellows According to Title Alphabetical order RIETI Alumni Research/Policy Papers Discussion Papers (English) Discussion Papers (Japanese) Policy Discussion Papers (English) Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) Technical Papers (English) Technical Papers (Japanese) Non Technical Summaries List of Articles in Journals Research Digest Discussion Papers Search Publications RIETI Books (English) RIETI Books (Japanese) History of Japan's Trade and Industry Policy Authors' Words Other Publications (English) Other Publications (Japanese) Events Symposiums Workshops BBL Seminars Archived Seminar Series Data JIP Database R-JIP Database CIP Database Industry-Specific Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates AMU and AMU Deviation Indicators JSTAR RIETI-TID RIETI FDI Database ICPA Project Links Articles Column Special Series Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal (METI Journal) Research Areas Fellows Research/Policy Papers Publications Events Data Articles Site Map Technical Issues Coontact Discussion Papers Search Close HomeArticlesSpecial SeriesIssues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2013 (January 2013) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2013 (January 2013) 2013 Will Be the Beginning of a New Era of Competition among Businesses:Japanese companies have considerable latitude to take the lead Tweet Print NAKAJIMA Atsushi Chairman, RIETI U.S. and European economies recovering from their lossesIn 2012, the European sovereign-debt crisis had a significant impact on the global economy. Money continued its risk-averse trend worldwide, leading to a weaker euro and falling global stock prices over the summer.However, measures to overcome the European sovereign-debt crisis have been making steady progress. A framework to avoid a public debt issue and a financial crisis has been put in place to a large degree, such as a second round of additional loans to Greece; the establishment of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM); Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), which is a mechanism of the European Central Bank (ECB) for purchasing government bonds; and progress toward a banking union. 2013 is expected to be a year when concerns about the debt crisis ease as the European economy experiences a bottoming out.Yet, it is too soon to say for sure whether the series of measures will bring the debt crisis to an end. The possibility that the severe fiscal tightening Greece promised will not be pursued due to significantly negative growth cannot be ruled out. In addition, as the amount of Greek government bonds held by private financial institutions has now become very small, a severe situation might be expected in which Germany and the European Union (EU) will cut their official financing to the Greek government, and there is fear that the debt crisis may be revived after the fall of 2013 in the wake of Germany's general election, to be held in September 2013.The U.S. economy, on the other hand, showed nothing but solid performance. The unemployment rate has fallen, and consumer spending has been steady. Above all, it is noteworthy that the recovery of the housing market has become more evident. Since the fall of Lehman Brothers, the adverse impact of the collapse of the financial bubble due to the subprime mortgage loans has shrunk considerably over the past four years, and this adjustment has progressed to the point where the housing market has returned quite close to its pre-bubble level in terms of both the ratio of household debt to disposable income and changes in the rate of homeownership (Figure 1).Figure 1. United States: Changes in the Rate of Homeownership (Note) Solid black line shows the average homeownership rate for 1968-1999 (64.6%)(Source) Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce Moreover, the shale gas revolution is also boosting the U.S. economy. Natural gas consumption in the United States compared with that in Europe—calculated by the differences in natural gas prices between the two—has reached 1.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP), meaning that this difference will increase GDP by 0.2%-0.3% every year. Partly helped by its avoidance of the fiscal cliff, the U.S. economy is likely to become even more stable as 2014 approaches. Progress in both restoring fiscal health and strengthening industrial competitivenessLikely developments in the European and U.S. economies will have certain implications in 2013. One is that both are steadily recuperating from their respective losses due to the debt crisis and the bubble, and are gradually changing their focus. In Europe, the framework for a unified EU has made further progress in the sovereign crisis, while the United States has significantly more leeway now to tackle the issue of restoring its fiscal health, as seen by its handling of the fiscal cliff, thanks to the progress made in the aftermath of the financial bubble.On that basis, in Europe, the need for economic growth to restore fiscal health is recognized. Meanwhile, in the United States, which is obtaining cheap and abundant energy, developments to strengthen its industrial competitiveness are becoming evident, such as the reshoring of manufacturing.Europe, too, has become very focused on improving its industrial competitiveness. In France, for example, the government's industrial policy, which used to involve income redistribution by combining tax cuts for small companies with tax hikes for large companies, has been changing, and, on November 6, 2012, the government announced measures to support business, an essential component of which is a 20-billion-euro tax break for businesses over the next three years.Of this 20-billion-euro tax break, 10 billion euros will come from an increase in the consumption tax, thus, the recovery of France's business competitiveness is likely to be incomplete, given the extent of its widening gap with Germany in terms of unit labor cost (Figure 2). However, the fact that the government has taken steps to strengthen the competitiveness of all companies, including large ones, is significant.Figure 2. Changes in Unit Labor Costs in Developed Countries/Regions(Note) 2000=1(Source) OECD Business competitiveness isn't just being tested in European countries. The same holds true for Japan. As Figure 2 indicates, among developed countries and regions, Japan has shown the greatest improvement in unit labor cost since 2000. In terms of savings-investment balance, Japan also has the largest financial surplus in the private sector on average among developed countries, suggesting that Japanese companies are financially sound (Figure 3). Nevertheless, exports, wages, and employment in Japan have been growing at a sluggish pace. Looking at Japan from the perspective of an economy supported by business, its global growth remains low, and the country has been slow to move out of deflation.Figure 3. Private Sector Savings-Investment Balance in Developed Countries(Note) Savings-investment balance as a percentage of GDP(Source) OECD The reason for this paradoxical state is the so-called sextuple whammy—the strong yen, electric power constraints, high effective corporate tax rates, strict targets for greenhouse gas emissions, delays in forming free trade agreements, and the rigid labor market. As a result of this, Japan's much-awaited corporate efforts are being offset.Of course, some parts of the sextuple whammy are understandable on an individual basis, and it is impossible to eliminate it completely. However, the current situation, in which only Japanese companies are heavily burdened, must change, given the environment of global competition. Japanese companies have significant latitude to take the lead in strengthening their business competitiveness Just as the new administration intends to combine bold monetary easing centered around an inflation target with a large-scale supplementary budget, the yen has been weakening as a result of the market factoring in these actions in advance. Although the response needs to take into account actual economic conditions and the serious fiscal deficit, what matters is how to reduce the heavy corporate burden with a sense of speed.Although concerns have been voiced about the widening trade deficit due to the weak yen, the risk of rising electric power prices due to increased imports and the weak yen could be mitigated if the government resumes operating the nuclear reactors whose safety has been confirmed. If a comprehensive investment tax credit and research and development (R&D) tax credit are implemented, the effective corporate tax rate could be reduced. If Japan announces its participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), that would also increase opportunities for Japanese companies. If these measures are implemented as a package, the business environment would change significantly, not only increasing the momentum of the Japanese economy, but also allowing its business competitiveness to recover.To strengthen corporate vitality, it is necessary to facilitate an increase in wages and employment. Although the earnings power of Japanese companies is low compared with that of other developed countries, Japan is still undergoing the greatest labor share decrease (Figure 4). This suggests that Japanese companies have taken a cautious stance toward investment and employment expansion in the uncertain environment. However, if this continues, the lack of demand will persist. Also, if the economy breaks away from deflation without raising personal income, that could have an adverse impact on consumption. However, if an increase in base pay is restored along with breaking away from deflation, a virtuous cycle can be expected in which improved corporate earnings will lead to higher wages and employment.Figure 4. Changes in Labor Share in Developed Countries(Source) OECD Since the global economy is expected to head into a recovery in 2013, there is no other way for Japan without taking advantage of this opportunity. In addition, if the mitigation of the sextuple whammy gains momentum, it will bring significant benefits not only to Japanese companies, but also to the economy, wages, and employment. Given that there is a high likelihood that this will happen in 2013, first of all, this will be a year in which Japan will be tested as to whether it can take the lead in strengthening its industrial competiveness. Doing so will provide Japan with significant more leeway to address other major issues, such as restoring its fiscal health. January 7, 2013>> Original text in Japanese Tweet January 30, 2013 Print Article(s) by this author Business Investment and Wage Growth are the Keys to Overcoming Inflation and Fiscal Balance Deterioration October 3, 2022［Column］ Make the Consumption Tax Hike an Opportunity to Steadily Raise the Wage Level August 29, 2019［RIETI Report］ Make the Consumption Tax Hike an Opportunity to Steadily Raise the Wage Level August 28, 2019［Policy Update］ Blockchain and Society 5.0-The Creation of a New Marketplace based on Distributed Consensus January 30, 2019［RIETI Report］ Signs that Japan’s Deflationary Mindset May Finally be Lifting? June 6, 2018［Policy Update］ Articles Column Special Series Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2024 (January 2024) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2023 (January 2023) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2022 (January 2022) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2021 (January 2021) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2020 (January 2020) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2019 (January 2019) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2018 (January 2018) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2017 (January 2017) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2016 (January 2016) Fellows' Views on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2015 (January 2015) Priorities for the Japanese Economy in 2014 (December 2013) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2013 (January 2013) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2012 (January 2012) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2009 (January 2009) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2008 (January 2008) Issues Facing the Japanese Economy in 2007 (January 2007) RIETI Fellows' View on Incident at Japanese Consulate-General in Shenyang (June 2002) Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal Communications Newsletter RSS Feed Facebook X YouTube Research Areas Research Programs (FY2024-2028) Research Programs (FY2020-2023) Research Programs (FY2016-2019) Research Programs (FY2011-2015) Policy Research Domains (FY2006-2010) Projects Survey Fellows Research/Policy Papers Discussion Papers (English) Discussion Papers (Japanese) Policy Discussion Papers (English) Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) Technical Papers (English) Technical Papers (Japanese) Non Technical Summaries List of Articles in Journals Research Digest Discussion Papers Search Publications RIETI Books (English) RIETI Books (Japanese) History of Japan's Trade and Industry Policy Authors' Words Other Publications (English) Other Publications (Japanese) Events Symposiums Workshops BBL Seminars Archived Seminar Series Data JIP Database R-JIP Database CIP Database Industry-Specific Nominal and Real Effective Exchange Rates AMU and AMU Deviation Indicators JSTAR RIETI-TID RIETI FDI Database ICPA Project Links Articles Column Special Series Newspapers & Magazines Fellows' Works VoxEU Column From IZA Perspectives from Around the World Other Contents RIETI Report Policy Update Keizai Sangyo Journal (METI Journal) About RIETI Privacy Policy Site Policy Site Map Help Contact METI Web Site Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, IAA (JCN 6010005005426)JCN: Japan Corporate Number Opinions expressed or implied on this website are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).Titles, numbers, specific names, etc. on this website are as of the date of publication. In the case of reposting material from our website, contact us beforehand. Top